Selvom vi ikke verificerer specifikke påstande, fordi anmeldernes meninger er deres egne, kan vi godt betegne anmeldelser som "Verificerede", når vi kan bekræfte, at der har fundet en forretningsinteraktion sted. Læs mere
Af hensyn til platformsintegriteten scannes alle anmeldelser på vores platform – verificerede eller ej – af vores automatiserede software døgnet rundt. Denne teknologi er designet til at identificere og fjerne indhold, der overtræder vores retningslinjer, herunder anmeldelser, som ikke er baseret på en reel oplevelse. Vi er klar over, at vi måske ikke fanger alle problemer, og du er velkommen til at gøre os opmærksom på det, hvis vi har overset noget. Læs mere
I received an unsolicited email from “Bauer Types” licensing (via fontradar) demanding a response within 3 business days and immediately threatening to “transfer the dispute to our legal team,” plus “additional costs” and a 15% penalty. No evidence was provided. No prior notice was received. Just pressure and implied consequences.
The communication implied that “past usage must be addressed” even though the font files had already been removed and were no longer being served. The tone strongly suggested financial liability without providing any formal legal documentation or clear substantiation of damages.
This approach appears to rely on automated web scanning of publicly accessible assets followed by pressure-based outreach framed around retroactive licensing claims.
While intellectual property enforcement is legitimate in principle, the execution here felt disproportionate and commercially aggressive rather than constructive. The messaging seems designed to create urgency and perceived liability rather than facilitate resolution.
Recipients should independently verify their current hosting status and seek neutral advice before responding.
There is no opportunity to speak to someone with legal expertise. They rely on font licences as they currently stand, not as they were purchased in the past. There is no room for discussion or negotiation. This is not good business practice and it is confusing.
They contacted me for using an unlicensed font, I removed the font from the website, they still say I should pay! I want to sue them for harresment.
I purchased a theme from ThemeForest which, unfortunately, included a font that turned out to be under a separate licence. Shortly after, I was contacted by FontRadar demanding nearly €200 for the font usage.
I explained that the font came as part of a legitimate ThemeForest purchase, but they showed no interest in resolving the matter fairly, it was purely about money, with little regard for professionalism or good business practice.
I would strongly advise anyone in a similar situation to seek legal advice before paying, as companies like this would likely struggle to win such a case if the font was obtained through a third party.
Unfortunately, I went ahead and paid the fee at the time, but after consulting with my lawyer, I was advised that I shouldn’t have done so.
Alle kan skrive en anmeldelse på Trustpilot. En anmeldelse er ejet af personen, som har skrevet den, og vedkommende kan derfor redigere eller slette den til enhver tid. En brugers anmeldelser bliver vist, så længe vedkommendes konto er aktiv.
Virksomheder kan bede deres kunder skrive en anmeldelse ved hjælp af automatiske invitationer. Denne type anmeldelser handler om reelle oplevelser og markeres "Verificeret".
Læs mere om andre typer anmeldelser.
Vi bruger en kombination af dedikerede medarbejdere og avanceret teknologi til at beskytte vores platform. Find ud af, hvordan vi bekæmper falske anmeldelser.
Læs om anmeldelsesprocessen på Trustpilot.
Hér finder du 8 tips til at skrive anmeldelser.
Verificering kan være med til at sikre, at det er rigtige mennesker, der skriver de anmeldelser, du læser på Trustpilot.
Det kan påvirke TrustScoren, når man tilbyder incitamenter i bytte for anmeldelser, eller når man kun spørger bestemte kunder, og det er imod vores retningslinjer.
