Selvom vi ikke verificerer specifikke påstande, fordi anmeldernes meninger er deres egne, kan vi godt betegne anmeldelser som "Verificerede", når vi kan bekræfte, at der har fundet en forretningsinteraktion sted. Læs mere

Af hensyn til platformsintegriteten scannes alle anmeldelser på vores platform – verificerede eller ej – af vores automatiserede software døgnet rundt. Denne teknologi er designet til at identificere og fjerne indhold, der overtræder vores retningslinjer, herunder anmeldelser, som ikke er baseret på en reel oplevelse. Vi er klar over, at vi måske ikke fanger alle problemer, og du er velkommen til at gøre os opmærksom på det, hvis vi har overset noget. Læs mere

2,6

Under middel

TrustScore 2.5 ud af 5

4 anmeldelser

5 stjerner
4 stjerner
3 stjerner
2 stjerner
1 stjerne

Har besvaret 50 % af deres negative anmeldelser

Svarer typisk inden for 24 timer

Sådan bruger denne virksomhed Trustpilot

Se, hvordan deres anmeldelser og bedømmelser indsamles, vurderes og modereres.

Virksomheder på Trustpilot må ikke tilbyde incitamenter eller betale for at skjule anmeldelser. Anmeldelser repræsenterer individuelle brugeres meninger, og ikke Trustpilots mening. Læs mere

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Violation of Privacy: Misleading “Profile”and Selling Unauthorised Publication: Private residential repairs exploited for lead generation, Serious business misconduct

This company published and selling my personal information including full name and an NCAT case on its website and indexed it on Google. The matter relates to an interim application for urgent bathroom repairs in a private residence. NCAT has not published this in their official decisions database, yet this site has made it searchable, created blog about me without consent. Public court lists allow transparency of proceedings. They do not automatically grant third parties the right to create monetised, search-optimised “profile” pages of private individuals based on withdrawn matters. That distinction is important. This matter has been reported to the OAIC and the ACCC for assessment.
When I requested removal, Mark J Smith, the business owner declined, claiming a leaky bathroom repair is a "newsworthy public record." He further stated an intention to publish a "detailed blog post" about my past civic advocacy. Google reviewed my legal request and removed the URL from search results for violating their personal-information policies. Despite this, the website continues to host the page and hide details behind a paywall. I have escalated this to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) and ACCC. I encourage anyone concerned about their privacy to check how their information is being used here.
(Mark James Smith is the business owner.) Please check the 1.0 rating Google reviews about him and his company.
Update: I contacted NCAT directly and was officially informed that no public record, decision, or listing exists for this matter. NCAT does not publish daily hearing lists with party names online, and no decision has been published on Caselaw NSW or AustLII.
This means the information on the site cannot have come from any publicly accessible official source. It appears to have been submitted privately by the opposing party, yet it is presented as verified public data.
Publishing personal litigation details from a non-public tribunal matter, without consent and without any public source, raises serious privacy concerns. The operator’s public response on Trustpilot was unnecessarily personal and confrontational, and the threat to publish an additional blog post about me only escalates the issue.
I requested removal through the site’s own process and received no substantive reply beyond the public Trustpilot post.
Potential users of this service should be aware that information presented as “100% from official court lists” may in fact originate from unverified private submissions.

13. februar 2026
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Dcpartners-logo

Besvarelse fra Dcpartners

Dear Kay, also known as Tiara Choi of Tiara Choi v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 70625.

We stand by our mission to provide transparency regarding public legal records. It is inconsistent to receive a 'privacy' complaint from an individual who has frequently used public platforms to call for the exposure of corruption and transparency in the strata sector. We will soon be publishing a detailed blog post regarding your public advocacy for transparency in strata management.

Furthermore, we received correspondence from an entity claiming to be 'Michael T Williams' of 'Pinnacle Legal Solutions' via a generic Gmail address. Our verification through the Law Society of NSW shows no registered solicitor by that name. We take the integrity of our platform seriously and do not remove newsworthy public records in response to unverified legal threats.

Our records are accessible to 99.99% of our users free of charge. We invite anyone interested in these public matters to search our database directly.

Yours faithfully,
Mark J Smith, Webmaster, dcpartners.solutions

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

My experience with Mark James Smith – Unprofessional and Inappropriate

I decided to trust Mark James Smith after meeting his daughter, Molly May Smith, during a trip to Switzerland. She seemed friendly and spoke highly of him, so I figured I’d be in good hands. Unfortunately, that wasn’t the case at all.

First off, his fees are outrageously high. I paid a significant amount for what was supposed to be a professional consultation, but it quickly became clear that Mark James Smith wasn’t serious about his work. The session lacked structure, and instead of focusing on the matters at hand, he was overly familiar and far from professional.

What made it worse was his inappropriate, tactile behavior throughout the meeting, which made me very uncomfortable. I had to remind him several times to maintain proper boundaries. He didn’t take it well. After I firmly called him out, he got visibly offended and abruptly ended the session, leaving many issues unresolved.

It’s shocking that someone who markets himself as a professional could behave in such a disrespectful manner. I wasted both my time and money, and the whole experience was far from what I expected.

In conclusion, I strongly advise against using Mark James Smith’s services. His behavior was inappropriate, his prices are far too high, and he showed no respect for personal boundaries. My connection to his daughter led me to believe I could trust him, but it turns out he’s not trustworthy at all.

19. oktober 2024
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

I had a terrible experience

I had a terrible experience with Mark J. Smith, who runs this site. After paying for what seemed like legitimate services, I never received anything. It quickly became clear that this is just a front to take people’s money. No communication, no follow-up—just a complete scam. Be very careful and do not trust this person or this business.

1. oktober 2024
Uopfordret anmeldelse

Dette er Trustpilot

Alle kan skrive en anmeldelse på Trustpilot. En anmeldelse er ejet af personen, som har skrevet den, og vedkommende kan derfor redigere eller slette den til enhver tid. En brugers anmeldelser bliver vist, så længe vedkommendes konto er aktiv.

Virksomheder kan bede deres kunder skrive en anmeldelse ved hjælp af automatiske invitationer. Denne type anmeldelser handler om reelle oplevelser og markeres "Verificeret".

Læs mere om andre typer anmeldelser.

Vi bruger en kombination af dedikerede medarbejdere og avanceret teknologi til at beskytte vores platform. Find ud af, hvordan vi bekæmper falske anmeldelser.

Læs om anmeldelsesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Hér finder du 8 tips til at skrive anmeldelser.

Verificering kan være med til at sikre, at det er rigtige mennesker, der skriver de anmeldelser, du læser på Trustpilot.

Det kan påvirke TrustScoren, når man tilbyder incitamenter i bytte for anmeldelser, eller når man kun spørger bestemte kunder, og det er imod vores retningslinjer.

Læs mere