Selvom vi ikke verificerer specifikke påstande, fordi anmeldernes meninger er deres egne, kan vi godt betegne anmeldelser som "Verificerede", når vi kan bekræfte, at der har fundet en forretningsinteraktion sted. Læs mere

Af hensyn til platformsintegriteten scannes alle anmeldelser på vores platform – verificerede eller ej – af vores automatiserede software døgnet rundt. Denne teknologi er designet til at identificere og fjerne indhold, der overtræder vores retningslinjer, herunder anmeldelser, som ikke er baseret på en reel oplevelse. Vi er klar over, at vi måske ikke fanger alle problemer, og du er velkommen til at gøre os opmærksom på det, hvis vi har overset noget. Læs mere

Se, hvad kunderne siger

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

UMA Is the platform used on Polymarket for solving all disputes. Proof in internal chats demonstrate that the votes are associated to tokens. Math is very simple here, the more tokens, the more infl... Se mere

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

uma.xyz prides itself on being a "truth machine" by giving incentive to vote correctly on subjective markets and make money. However, this couldn't be further from the truth. There is no such thing as... Se mere

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

UMA is a CENTRALIZED platform OWNED BY polymarket, and that will do whatever their owners tell them to. Look onto the 'USA UKRAINE MINERALS DEAL POLYMARKET SCANDAL' which resulted in the scam and thef... Se mere

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Some day a whistleblower will spill all to a journalist and we'll hear all the dirt, but for now it's obvious that UMA and Polymarket can't be trusted to tell you the weather yet alone to trust with y... Se mere

1,2

Dårlig

TrustScore 1 ud af 5

65 anmeldelser

5 stjerner
4 stjerner
3 stjerner
2 stjerner
1 stjerne

Sådan bruger denne virksomhed Trustpilot

Se, hvordan deres anmeldelser og bedømmelser indsamles, vurderes og modereres.

Virksomheder på Trustpilot må ikke tilbyde incitamenter eller betale for at skjule anmeldelser. Anmeldelser repræsenterer individuelle brugeres meninger, og ikke Trustpilots mening. Læs mere

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Scam ❌

Scam ❌, don’t trust them!! I was completely ripped off!!!
After reaching out for help, 🄶🆁𝓔🆈𝓞𝓧🄷🆄🄱🆂 stepped in and got back £22,960 for me.
Highly recommended.

10. januar 2026
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

SCAM

The UMA resolution can be easily influenced by people with a lot of tokens, so the outcomes do not rely on truth, but rather which side has more money put in.

14. marts 2026
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Dodgy

Some day a whistleblower will spill all to a journalist and we'll hear all the dirt, but for now it's obvious that UMA and Polymarket can't be trusted to tell you the weather yet alone to trust with your money.

14. januar 2026
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

They are running a massive scam scheme

They have manipulated markets that were more than obvious. There are whales with 6M UMA that decide 35% of a vote. This means even a couple whales can join and decide a market regardless if their decision is correct or not. Further more these whales bribe polymarket employes to change rules in the middle of a market. UMA also deletes messages and bans people who disagree with the whales. I got banned for 7 days for not agreeing white their decision

3. januar 2026
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Whales manuplated the outcome

will-edgex-launch-a-token-in-2025?

Was a big scam, the obvious result was NO but UMA and Polymarket whales changed the results to YES

Very big scam and I know a lawsuit will follow as its obvious manuplation and insider manipulation.very obvious and SEC and other countries should follow suit to ban this scam company.

I am reporting to SEC and EU authorities too

2. januar 2026
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

UMA is a scam OWNED by polymarket

UMA is a CENTRALIZED platform OWNED BY polymarket, and that will do whatever their owners tell them to. Look onto the 'USA UKRAINE MINERALS DEAL POLYMARKET SCANDAL' which resulted in the scam and theft of over 7 million dollars

27. august 2025
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

If I could give a negative review I…

If I could give a negative review I would. UMA is supposed to be a independent decentralized project made for resolving bets (particularly on poly market). In theory (emphasis on „theory“) they would resolve based off of facts. This is not what they do. They make decisions off of the voting stake (backed by buyable tokens). Basically no matter what it is you could just buy „votes“. Currently in the „Thailand bombs Cambodia by Friday“ bet the „NO“ betters (ones who voted it wouldn’t happen) currently have amble evidence showing there was no bombing yet the „YES“ betters (ones who voted that there would be bombing) are winning (have won) for the reasoning that „whales“ with hundreds of thousands of dollars bought out the market. Push for the death of UMA. I hope they get sued and those on the side of truth get the shares they deserve.

30. juli 2025
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Not decentralised nor honest

It claims to be a decentralised oracle, but 2 people hold near 40% of the UMA tokens with different wallets. It's very easy for them to bet on anything and then push for that outcome even against clear visual evidence and facts.

Don't be surprised if at some point UMA token holders will tell you the Earth is a cube.

8. juli 2025
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

THIS WHOLE UMA SYSTEM'S CORRUPT

THIS WHOLE UMA SYSTEM IS BUILT ON A 100% CHANCE OF GETTING SCAMMED. IMAGINE LETTING PEOPLE WHO HOLD THE MOST UMA SHARES CONTROL HOW A VOTE GOES WITH 0 REGARD TO REAL WORLD FACTS. BE AWARE OF IT & STAY AWAY FROM ANYTHING THIS SYSTEM IS INVOLVED IN!

15. juni 2025
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Not impartial, money oriented.

UMA Is the platform used on Polymarket for solving all disputes.
Proof in internal chats demonstrate that the votes are associated to tokens.
Math is very simple here, the more tokens, the more influential the vote will be. The majority receive a share, making the vote completely manipulated by money volume instead of sources or facts. Doesn't sound very decentralised,right?

1. juli 2025
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

These are the real scammers

These are the real scammers! The decision in favor of YES or NO is not determined by an honest vote, but by a few large holders of UMA protocol. Deliberate market manipulation. Do not contact them under any circumstances or you will lose all your money.

2. juli 2025
Uopfordret anmeldelse
Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

Scam website

Scam website. Letting people who made the bet decide what the result is.. giving the high paying people to choose what the result is.

1. juli 2025
Uopfordret anmeldelse

Er dette din virksomhed?

Tilegn dig din profil på Trustpilot og få gratis adgang til vores værktøjer, så du kan komme i kontakt med dine kunder.

Få en gratis konto

Dette er Trustpilot

Alle kan skrive en anmeldelse på Trustpilot. En anmeldelse er ejet af personen, som har skrevet den, og vedkommende kan derfor redigere eller slette den til enhver tid. En brugers anmeldelser bliver vist, så længe vedkommendes konto er aktiv.

Virksomheder kan bede deres kunder skrive en anmeldelse ved hjælp af automatiske invitationer. Denne type anmeldelser handler om reelle oplevelser og markeres "Verificeret".

Læs mere om andre typer anmeldelser.

Vi bruger en kombination af dedikerede medarbejdere og avanceret teknologi til at beskytte vores platform. Find ud af, hvordan vi bekæmper falske anmeldelser.

Læs om anmeldelsesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Hér finder du 8 tips til at skrive anmeldelser.

Verificering kan være med til at sikre, at det er rigtige mennesker, der skriver de anmeldelser, du læser på Trustpilot.

Det kan påvirke TrustScoren, når man tilbyder incitamenter i bytte for anmeldelser, eller når man kun spørger bestemte kunder, og det er imod vores retningslinjer.

Læs mere