The Guardian Anmeldelser 130

'The Guardian' is one of the few independent, trustworthy media outlets in the UK. The fact that it has so many trolls on Trustpilot writing absurd reviews straining the one braincell in their heads to write is, frankly, a huge recommendation for the product.

Jonathan Liew - you are paid to be a journalist, I appreciate that. Therefore, you are supposed to be provocative.

However, your pathetic attempt to link the opening of a Gail’s café as a symbol of the Gaza war is utterly despicable. It’s a bakery and café. A link to Bain Capital’s investments - really? Clutching at straws to try and justify your attempt to stoke social discontent, and worse, violence. We know multi-culturalism is an abject failure - you demonstrate this very clearly.

In an era of volatility, irresponsible journalism like this is shameful. I trust you are embarrassed and I encourage you to have a moment of self-reflection around your purpose in life.

  Earth 2026 .;   The Fourth Doctor K9 and Romana mk1 are confronted  by the agents of  Statesman  Starmmohr and locked up on the grounds of being  suspected of being agents for enemy powers . The Guardian has been asked to propogate against the new arrivals in order to construct a background of disetant activity and unsafe acedimeia   . In due course The  Doctor escapes his captvity from the Confirm a mizer chamber   which was designed to empty his mind of indidivual thoughts and scruples  . However after being attacked by two tribes with flags the  Doctor falls into the lesser world of the planet and is duely shocked by a mental health pandemic where unscruplious proefeisonals profiteer out of the abject misery of the public .   The Docotr meets the segiment of society who have been , taught , medicated  and instructed to feel bad most of the time and lives under SS's  creed of the new normal , with a unqestioning mind regarding deeper matters .  The Doctor soon learns that  public services such as the NHS are run for managerial  profits and weponised against the public . The Doctor must battle a formidble and slippery foe . An entity know as The Supreme Samaratain . 
However the Dcotor soon gets cuaght up in a crossfire between Prince NHS and Prince Banker . Who are locked into battle over matters related to the Jleks and Aleks of the  Middle Earth . Can the Doctor and Romana tackle the propanda of the elders ? and their power hold of mani pu ledia   order to divert the plebian class from concerning themselves with the domestic derliction of their own planet. ? With The Guardian having been tasked with downplaying and normalising the daily weirdnes of Statesman Starmorrr . The Doctor must move fast to avert the end of all thoughs and free will amongst the people .

Totally biased to the left wing. Why can't newspapers just report facts.

Genuine fact driven reporting using statistics and data with supporting links.
Sadly demonised by many biased xenophobic roundabout painters as you would expect who want their prejudicial views vindicating.

As a casual visitor to the home page, it's annoying to find the lower half of that page blocked by a demand for money. If you click on an item, the same thing happens to the new web page. Yes, The Guardian needs to pay for its activities but this constant wheedling has lost its effect. I also read The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mirror websites for balance, but they are less intrusive in their 'asks'.

The great sources of news.
Convenient website, no intrusive ads even in case of a free version, no fake news.

Maybe its my lack of IT skills, but I can not remove the all pervasive extreme bias this disgrace of news "reporting" that is forced on me through Google.... ah maybe I've answered my own question!

The Guardian is a rubbish media outlet that has proven its left wing bias.
Avoid reading this crap if you want real news.

Terrible to navigate. There is nothing intuitive so the only option is to keep pressing buttons until something appears. Unbelievably unusable.

The latest edition doesn’t always load when you open the app. There are no messages of assurance.

The move to make the digital product look like a paper facsimile is bizarre and a retrograde step from where the app was before.

Whoever is making the decisions about the Guardian’s digital strategy needs to consider their future.

Poor quality propaganda page. They lie. They are extremely biased. They are the Nazi's. Claim that others are liars and dangerous, but claim to be independent and not billionaire owned. Yet they are billionaire owned and still beg for money.

One of the worst media groups

The Guardian love to portray and demonise the British public. Everything that we apparently do is ‘far right’ and ‘fascist’. Angry about the state of our country? ‘far right.’ Concerned about the rising levels of illegal immigration? ‘far right.’ Have different political views? ‘far right.’ It’s so one sided and hypocritical, it’s insane. I’m sick and tired of looking at articles that make everyday, parents, grandparents, sons, daughters etc. look hateful. it’s not true. Everyone involved should be ashamed.

The gaurdian is horrific news outlet, so bias i have never read a objective article, amazing they are still going

With such a left leaning view I can't believe what I am reading. I look for fair and balanced news. Not hate and fear mongering!

Dette medie er landsforræder mod England, 3 journalister med muslimsk baggrund dækket histore omkring den store demonstration i England. Journalister påstod der var 110.000 demonstranter men andre medie oplyser at over 1mio demonstranter var på gaderne. the Guardian Beviser her at de laver fake News og misinformation befolkningen.

Gi helved må tag jer

Some good journalism but it is the comment section that annoys me. Any comment that is not wildly left-wing or in any way takes issue with other commentators going on a communist-leaning rant is blocked by the invigilators.
There is no debate other than total agreement with wildly left-leaning political thinking. Anything else is either lynched or cancelled.

Disappointed by the journalism from Moria Donegan who clearly hasn’t done proper research before writing an article on Charlie Kirk. If you watch his debates you would know he doesn’t resort to shouting as claimed and does not make sexist or racist remarks. Please actually watch his debates rather than recycling misinformation.

Also another article from a separate journalist quotes “If I see a Black pilot, I’m going to be like, boy, I hope he’s qualified.
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 23 January 2024
You’ve taken this remark totally out of context. If you bothered to research you would understand Charlie was against lowering of standards just to recruit more minorities, he said he cared about excellence and didn’t care about the race of the pilot, just that they all had the same standards to get qualified. He wasn’t against pilots being black or otherwise, just they all needed the same pass rate to be equally skillful. This lowering of standards required for minorities to recruit more minorities is unique to America, but if you don’t understand this please stop writing articles about a topic you haven’t researched. Charlie has massive followings in America from all genders and races. If he was just spewing hate I don’t think this would be the case do you?

Three stars, not because I suffer from lead poisoning and live by reactionary views, but because of the spineless "Accept cookies, or pay to reject" trash a lot of UK sites have pushed out in the last year. Other than that, It's a fine hub of journalism.

Despite the frothing rants of some delusional right wingers, the Guardian is not "neo communist"... The Guardian is a pretty wishy washy, barely left of centre, London centric paper. Generally reliable, not beholden to corporate interests (it is owned by a trust, not a billionaire oligarch). Environmental reporting is generally good, but I'm really not interested in "fantasy homes near golf courses". Despite other comments, the online version is free, not behind a pay wall.