Strongrootswebdesign Anmeldelser 1

TrustScore 3 ud af 5

3,2

Selvom vi ikke verificerer specifikke påstande, fordi anmeldernes meninger er deres egne, kan vi godt betegne anmeldelser som "Verificerede", når vi kan bekræfte, at der har fundet en forretningsinteraktion sted. Læs mere

Af hensyn til platformsintegriteten scannes alle anmeldelser på vores platform – verificerede eller ej – af vores automatiserede software døgnet rundt. Denne teknologi er designet til at identificere og fjerne indhold, der overtræder vores retningslinjer, herunder anmeldelser, som ikke er baseret på en reel oplevelse. Vi er klar over, at vi måske ikke fanger alle problemer, og du er velkommen til at gøre os opmærksom på det, hvis vi har overset noget. Læs mere


Kontaktoplysninger

3,2

Middel

TrustScore 3 ud af 5

1 anmeldelse

5 stjerner
4 stjerner
3 stjerner
2 stjerner
1 stjerne

Sådan bruger denne virksomhed Trustpilot

Se, hvordan deres anmeldelser og bedømmelser indsamles, vurderes og modereres.

Virksomheder på Trustpilot må ikke tilbyde incitamenter eller betale for at skjule anmeldelser. Anmeldelser repræsenterer individuelle brugeres meninger, og ikke Trustpilots mening. Læs mere

Bedømt til 1 ud af 5 stjerner

I recently terminated services with Strong Roots Web Design

I recently terminated services with Sarah Gershone due to her lack of preparedness and professionalism in actually completing the project. Specifically, we had our first official meeting to start the project, what she limits to one hour. As per our agreement I had sent her all content five days earlier including the proposed website outline, and suggested content for all areas. She acknowledged receiving the information and replied "looks good." At the time of the meeting, it was immediately evident she had not reviewed any of the content. For example, the first document she brought up was a list of assessment tools I use which simply an insert. She described this as the "home page". When I told her this was simply an insert, she could not find the home page, so I had to take over the screen sharing and show her the home page document. She then had no specific comment on any of the documentation I previously sent her. Later in the session she made a general comment that the documentation I had produced was not good, implying it could not be used on the website. For reference, I identified content for every area of my practice (such as anxiety, depression) did searches on typical statements therapist make, created my own version and then ran it through AI several times. I provided her multiple examples in each area. Sarah then proceeded to ask me vague (she describes them as "open-ended") questions, such as the type of client's that come to my practice. When I asked specifics such as mostly males, better educated etc, she wasn't satisfied with my response. The session was ended earlier because it was clear to both of us it was a very unproductive meeting. Within one hour (11 am) I sent her an email specifying three concerns: 1) if she didn't like my content she had five days to review it, she could have told me prior to the meeting and/or rescheduled; 2) if she wants to ask open-ended questions which is how she wants to form the website, she should have let me know the questions ahead of time (per her agreement there is only one hour for the meeting) and 3) it was very unlikely she had not properly prepared for the meeting. I finished the email that I was still willing to work with her, but I needed a very different effort from her. After 24 hours she had not replied so I ended services with her. When she did reply her choice was to say I was defensive during the meeting and not acknowledging the obvious she had not done her job. I requested full reimbursement due to her lack of services and told her I would not pursue matters further. Instead she "itemized" out $1700 worth of services she said she already done, which is remarkable since we had only 30 minutes of the first working session, for which she was not prepared. Sarah notes on her website she is a "busy mom of four [children]". So I understand if someone does not always follow through. What concerns me is her lack of accountability and feeling she is entitled to $1700 with no meaningful work produced. I am sure she will respond to this review with she did what was on the contract. However, much of this is only verifiable by her and she does not acknowledge the obvious (as recorded on her session) she was not prepared to do the work. I gave her multiple opportunities to either change her business approach or refund the money. She did neither. I suggest you think seriously about this before signing any contract with her.

15. januar 2026
Uopfordret anmeldelse

Er dette din virksomhed?

Tilegn dig din profil på Trustpilot og få gratis adgang til vores værktøjer, så du kan komme i kontakt med dine kunder.

Få en gratis konto

Dette er Trustpilot

Alle kan skrive en anmeldelse på Trustpilot. En anmeldelse er ejet af personen, som har skrevet den, og vedkommende kan derfor redigere eller slette den til enhver tid. En brugers anmeldelser bliver vist, så længe vedkommendes konto er aktiv.

Virksomheder kan bede deres kunder skrive en anmeldelse ved hjælp af automatiske invitationer. Denne type anmeldelser handler om reelle oplevelser og markeres "Verificeret".

Læs mere om andre typer anmeldelser.

Vi bruger en kombination af dedikerede medarbejdere og avanceret teknologi til at beskytte vores platform. Find ud af, hvordan vi bekæmper falske anmeldelser.

Læs om anmeldelsesprocessen på Trustpilot.

Hér finder du 8 tips til at skrive anmeldelser.

Verificering kan være med til at sikre, at det er rigtige mennesker, der skriver de anmeldelser, du læser på Trustpilot.

Det kan påvirke TrustScoren, når man tilbyder incitamenter i bytte for anmeldelser, eller når man kun spørger bestemte kunder, og det er imod vores retningslinjer.

Læs mere