Lux Trading Firm Anmeldelser 625

For a $1M challenge:
Max loss per trade is .3% - $3k
Max Profit per trade is .6% - $7.5k
Profit Target is 15%

Statistically:

If you win every trade at a 1:2.5 risk reward, it would take you 20 trades in a row to earn the account

If you win half your trades at a 1:2.5 risk reward, it would take you 76 trades in a row to earn the account

Now I would say with this risk to reward ratio, you're probably winning less than 50%. Do the math....

Response to Lux's Reply:
They boast about being an A-book company but the funded challenge that would take 2+ years to complete (sarcasm but maybe not) is on match trader and definitely not A-book. The slippage is horrible. Again, if a trader wants to sit in a challenge for a long time to "maybe" get an account when there are plenty of B-book prop firms out there that will fund and pay out quickly, good luck!

Response 2:
1. Yes, initially I read the rules incorrectly and after I failed a challenge, I decided I wanted to give insight to what traders should expect with the prop firm. Since I read the rules incorrectly, I'll give you an extra star!
2. Never claimed funded accounts weren't A-book, the challenge phase has higher spread/slippage than I've experienced with other prop firms.
3. I don't mind strict profit/loss limitations as it protects the trader and future of the account. Most popular prop firms have these limitations, just not as strict as Lux.
4. As ratings are declining, it may be a good option as a company to discuss how you can present the rules more transparently and be less defensive on your trust pilot replies.

I managed to catch the promo for the 2x bigger account sizes, and the leverage for the price is insane. Getting double the account size for the same price gives me way more room to manage trades properly. Because of the fixed drawdown, I’m not panicking over every small move. Everything from the clean rules to the responsive support team feels transparent and well-structured.

Found out their rules need to have the profit target reached using 20 or so different trades etc. Pretty much 5% consistency rule. which will take at least few weeks to pass assume you are profitable most of the time, which is unlikely for any traders. so its about few months to pass. Good luck passing their challenge, btw they didnt put these absurb rules in main page until you hit your profit and found out the hard way.

Their trading rules are traps, i have been with them for a while, but found out that they are interested in the traders failure rather than passing.
Their rules are too many and tasking.
Why would a prop firm limit a traders ability to profit.

Before they have a minimum trading days of six weeks, they removed this and introduced other rules that will extend your trading days to six weeks.

I don't think they are really honest about traders getting good payout, their high trading funding is a ruse, if you go through their rules, you will discover this.

They are one of the rogues in prop firm industry.

The customer support team here is excellent. I’ll admit I didn't read the rules as closely as I should have at first, but the team was patient and helped me understand where I went wrong. The Risk Desk analysis is incredibly detailed and has actually helped me improve my risk management.

Switching to Lux was a great move. Unlike other firms with complex two-phase challenges, their 1-stage evaluation is very straightforward. It feels much more realistic and doesn't force you to rush your trades to meet a tight deadline. Highly recommended for serious traders.

The new Lux trading rules are very good, i have not yet passed my evaluation but im hopeful to pass . the reset fees are somehow affordable and i trust i will make it.. Customer Support is always on timely and i really appreciate . Looking forward to passing my account and proceed to the next step

I won a giveway. The support is very active. I receive new account on very short delay. I begin experience with them. Very good company.

As always, excellent and quick service.

Good morning, I've been trading with Lux Trading Firm for several months, however I haven't yet been approved for the next phase. Even so, I have to say the company is excellent, as it has taught me to trade consistently, observing the risk management of each operation. I opened a new account on December 3rd, and I'm doing really well, thanks to the rules the company sets, as this protects us; after all, a loss isn't a mistake. I always lost with proprietary companies full of rules, such as trailing stops, which makes us lose the account quickly, and that's exactly what these companies want: to sell more accounts. With Lux Trading Firm it's different; they want us to perform well, aiming for a long-term relationship. Thank you for the support I've received.

I just started trading with Lux Trading Firm and they are different from 99.8% of all prop firms out there today. I would say that they are a genuine trading firm that wants you to grow as a trader and be able to manage risk so that they can make money through you.

So you trade with their capital and not some simulated demo account like most others. Prop firms that use simulated demo accounts make their money through the fees that you pay for the account and the profits that you make are taken from this pot. So they make money as long as you fail and therefore they have all sorts of rules that will make you fail. An example is "trailing drawdown".

Recommend them!

I joined Lux Trading and passed the first stage of the evaluation, but I broke several rules and my account was fairly reset. Honestly, this made me realize how valuable their strict rules are—they push you to develop discipline and understand what trading truly is. The platform is straightforward, easy to use, and their support team has been great whenever I needed help.

Lux Trading is not for people looking for shortcuts or quick profits—it is for traders who are serious about surviving and growing in the long run. In my opinion, this firm is one of the best choices if you want to challenge yourself and become a disciplined trader.

To me their "risk consistency" rule is not complient with proper trading.
It is obvious that a corner stone of risk management is to adapt risk exposure according to market conditions.
For example traders will adapt their position size to market volatility (it is insane to trade with the same amount of risk when the vix is at 40 or at 20...) or for a given strategy traders will start with low exposure (this is what two times US investing championship winner Mark Minervini calls "dipping your toes in the water") and increase if successful and decrease when less successful.
Their "risk consistency" rule forces the trader to choose an amount of risk at the beginning and stick with it until the end of evaluation, no matter how the market conditions change or your strategy works. You can never adapt your risk to volatility or use progressive exposure. If you dip your toes in the water you'll never going to be able to enter if it's warm and if you dive at first in cold water you risk hydrocution...
After spending 6 month getting the 3K required to pass the evaluation stage 1 on a 50K account (with 50K you only have 5K to trade in reality that's why it's long) I got noticed by mail, at my request in order to access the next step, that I broke their "risk consistency" rule and cannot access to the next stage.
I realized then that I did not pay enough attention to this rule when I signed their form, probably because I didn't expect such a rule to exist. During the process everything seemed right without any notification that I broke this rule, letting me lose my time in that program.
I traded in a swing trading style, with a risk of 200$ to 400$ per trade (0.4 to 0.8%) and used progressive exposure with a maximal total opened risk of 600$ (1.2%). Of course I signed the form after reading it twice, so I'm the one to blame for that. One star is for putting such a rule and for letting me loose my time without any alert for breaking of their "risk consistency" rule. I hope this can prevent traders like me to make the wrong choice of prop firm.

PS after luxtradingfirm answer :
Hello lux trading firm,
You can share the details of my trades with pleasure. Make a video out of it too, it would be great, even if I doubt that you would be fair when I read your answer (I broke many rules etc). And by the way think to explain how a trader can deal with your locking rule under changing market conditions such a substantial increase of market volatility, as they could be forced to risk twice they wanted risk just to follow your risk % consistency rule.
There something though that I understand in your answer, you have to preserve your real money.
And you should not worry for the one star since it's only rating my experience with you, which is really far from good, as people can read my review and judge by themselves if what I am telling is non sense or not.

2nd PS : An increase of volatility occurs in parallel with and increase of fear and uncertainty, so not only do you have moves of bigger magnitude but also moves become more erratic. Having bigger SL and reduced lot sizes is not enough because volatile markets are not just a bigger form of calm markets. The proper way to adapt is to also reduce exposure i.e. lower risk per trade percentage, which cannot be done with your risk consistency rule. Preventing traders to risk 0.5% in volatile markets when they risk 1% in calm markets is not understandable. But again this is only my review and in the same way I would rate one star a 3* restaurant if they served me fish and chips, because I think most people would feel like me and be disappointed.

Guys please be aware for their 1 million dollar account, you can only risk 0.3% of the total 1M and not 6%. This means if your drawdown ever goes above 3k at any point, you've failed. How in the world can anyone ever get to 150k profit target with a max drawdown of 3k. They won't tell you this, they will remain quiet and wait until you reach the target, and then they will say you dint pass! I believe they intentional worded this rule in a very misleading way on their website to lure people in!

When I red other peoples review before Is tarted I thought its just angry people who failed but I just passed 1M funded with the perfect consistent and not leveraging and using the same risk and profit as much tarder can do , and they ill still make an excuse, Regarless of your results, don't waste your money, This feels like a trap from the start

They don't offer a demo account. How on earth could you test your strategy and ensure you're falling within all of the detailed rules if you can't even open a demo account to test out a few trades.

Instead they gave me a link to open a demo account on matchtrader, where the symbols and spreads would be different.

They expect you to do all of the legwork for them and you still can't even test their own account.

On top of everything they have many little exceptions in place designed to disqualify you, so it's basically walking a tight rope at all times - one such example is you can't adjust your stop loss 30 seconds before or after a news event - which is absolutely insane because the spreads get really wide during news events and this is has the same effect as tightening your stop loss, but your not allowed do anything to prevent that or you get disqualified!

When I asked their agent why they wouldn't offer a demo account he said it was too expensive. So they can offer $1 million dollar accounts for you to trade but they can't offer you a demo account...

These guys and their business model is to profit from your failure, don't spend your money here.

I started the evaluation with high hopes, but several frustrating issues led me to give a 2-star rating.
Initially, I used their demo mode, which was a great way to get familiar with their platform. Satisfied with the experience, I moved on to the paid evaluation. However, within weeks, they announced a switch to the Match-Trader platform, supposedly to improve the trading environment and meet trader demands. The integration of TradingView charts was a welcome feature, and at first, everything seemed fine.
After the switch, I expected some teething issues, but certain changes directly impacted my ability to trade effectively. One major issue was the restriction on lot sizes. I primarily trade low-priced crypto, which requires large lot sizes, but they imposed a fixed cap on all assets. Initially, they adjusted the cap on some assets without issue, but when I requested an adjustment for a crypto asset priced at a fraction of a cent, they refused. Their response dismissed the obvious logic behind my request, claiming my proposed lot size was "nonsensical."
When I pointed out that this restriction didn't exist when I signed up and that I had paid £500 for an evaluation under different conditions, their response was outright dismissive. One representative even told me to "calm down" and questioned "who I thought I was"—an unprofessional and unacceptable response. To be fair, not all their support staff were this rude; previous lot size adjustments were handled politely by a different representative. However, the refusal to address my concerns meant I had to accept that I could no longer trade certain assets, significantly limiting my strategy.
Fast forward to today, and yet another major change has been forced upon traders: the TradingView integration on Match-Trader has been removed without warning. I emailed support, only to be told that Match-Trader no longer offers this feature—even though my demo account with Match-Trader still has it?Whether this is misinformation or an outright excuse, it’s hard to believe they would implement such a change without notifying traders.
The platform is now worse than before. Basic features that were previously available are gone, like the ability to drag pending order markers, which now have to be entered manually. This is a massive inconvenience for me as a 1-minute timeframe trader—it adds unnecessary delays to trade execution, making trading conditions harder than they originally were when I signed up.
At this point, it feels like they are either deliberately making trading conditions more difficult or their system updates are riddled with issues that support is unwilling to acknowledge. I have yet to receive a proper response to my concerns, and frankly, I’m tempted to abandon this evaluation altogether and go with a more reputable firm like FTMO.
The only reason this isn’t a 1-star review is that one customer support member has been helpful in the past. But overall, this experience has been incredibly disappointing. It’s clear Lux Trading does not prioritise its traders or their best interests.
Reading their replies to negative reviews, it’s clear that Lux Trading is defensive and dismissive of complaints, often blaming traders in a rude manner, even when errors or unclear communication occur. Rather than acknowledging or compensating for system issues, they hide behind technical disclaimers, insisting that traders are responsible for identifying discrepancies in their dashboards. Their responses show a lack of empathy and flexibility, focusing more on enforcing terms than actually addressing trader concerns constructively. This was exactly the tone I experienced when I made a complaint—completely unprofessional behaviour. Instead of handling the issue properly, they were defensive and dismissive, making it obvious they have a lot to learn about customer service.
Reading their replies to negative reviews, it’s clear that Lux Trading is defensive and dismissive of complaints, often blaming traders in a rude manner, even when errors or unclear communication occur. Rather than acknowledging or compensating for system issues, they hide behind technical disclaimers, insisting that traders are responsible for identifying discrepancies in their dashboards. Their responses show a lack of empathy and flexibility, focusing more on enforcing terms than actually addressing trader concerns constructively. This was exactly the tone I experienced when I made a complaint—completely unprofessional behaviour. Instead of handling the issue properly, they were defensive and dismissive, making it obvious they have a lot to learn about customer service.
Update : Their response perfectly illustrates my point.

han quitado la plataforma metatrader y la nuva no vale nada y han subido los spreads

Lux trading is SCAM and these guys are THIEF and they're doing it under some strange rules that you never find in other prop firms so they're able to make you fail deliberately.
I bought a $1M account. They have a rule that you have to manage risk size based on 6% of remaining capital. Just think about it. How many trades should you open and win to hit 10% profit target. As a swing trader, it takes years this way.
They lied to me that their $200K accounts doesn't have this rule in the first challenge phase so you're free to risk size you want therefore I changed my $1M account to two $200K accounts. Although they imposed high fee for this change. finally after hitting target successfully and winning challenge phase they made another excuse that you have risked too high per trade and not consistent because they calculate risk size based on 6% of remaining capital. I have risked 1-2 % of capital per trade consistently which is a standard in the market but they don't accept it and find another excuse.
They called my big profits ,lucky trades and they didn't accept those big profits which was generated in super trends. I'm a swing trader. How on earth that getting super trends and winning big is a breach of rule? It's funny. I'm a trend trader and winning big trends is smart and healthy but they call it breach of rule of exceeding 10% profit.
So they didn't accept my successful passing of challenge phase and didn't pay me back 50% of fee.
STAY AWAY FROM THESE THIEVES PLEASE
I swear to God that this company is SCAM. I made a mistake buying their challenge and lost £1500. You don't do it.
And lux trading, be aware that you can't steal from people like this. God will revenge in his way one day.

They charge $1260 for $10Mn account:
As per their rules book, even on live acc (as confirmed by their customer service executive Rastislav):
Max Loss per trade not more than 5% of risk capital: 5% on $60k = $3 risk per trade
Max Profit per trade not more than 5% of profit target: 5% on $150k = $7.5k
Essentially profit factor is 2.5 even on Live acc, which is limiting the potential to ride a big trend especially for swingers, i can understand for eval acc as they want to test u, but limiting profits in live account doesnt make sense. I'm not saying 2.5 RR is bad but we can simply keep trailing SL into profits for riding a trend ... There's no proper explanation from Rastislav on this rule either, instead he said: "it's not for me and u to decide the RR limits, it's used by big banks, if u can't adhere, it's fine we can't accommodate every trader" basically he asked me to get the hell of out here with a generic canned response .... what kind of big bank does it? These big players are mostly swingers & they aim for a higher RR by riding the trend...This max profit limit doesn't make any sense anyway, looks like u r doing some shady business (essentially we are risking 3k for 7.5k which is similar to RR of $200k or similar account sizes with around 1% risk). Hope u r not scamming ppl with the dream of showing $1m or u either have fund issues going on. Hopefully I'm wrong but you r not able to explain this rule neither gained my trust. Finding another prop. bye

Edit: Lux, u have replied to me below, hence there's no option to respond & prove, pls write a mail (u have my mail) & I'll share u the screenshots of customer service chat by Rastislav where he confirmed profit cannot be more than 5% of profit target $150k in case of $10M account, the same is mentioned in ur rule book as well. I'm surprised you are twisting ur words below by saying max profit limit is 10%. For everyone reading this, please go through their rules once, U'll see it's mentioned max profit on $10mn acc cannot be more than 5% of profit target

Edit 2: see now u have corrected to 5% in ur reply below. And yes $7.5k on $10mn with risking $3k is 2.5RR which is okyish but my question is why is it limited on live account if we can ride bigger trend with more potential profit by trailing SL into profits (absolutely no risk in this).